|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 3, 2005 22:22:46 GMT
Bloody hell this was so draggy! I will watch the 2nd part but think I'll tape it instead and flick through the boring bits.
Just what is ITV's obsession with crime?
Patsy
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick on Oct 3, 2005 22:38:13 GMT
TV has gone crime mad.....and they show you all the murdery bits...no wonder the youth of today are descending into a mire of thuggery and violence...Old Dixon of Dock green and The avengers got on with it..and you didn't see a drop of blood..and more importantly you didn't have to..the viewer was intelligent enough to know the victim was dead without seeing his guts splattered all over the place....don't set me off again Patsy lol
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 3, 2005 22:49:22 GMT
LOL! It is ridiculous though. Trailers for more bloody crime to come (Vincent and that thing with Robert Lindsay as 'Scotland Yard's finest'). ITV really have no imagination. I think about the variety of shows on when we were younger and I could scream. If it's not docusoaps and reality TV with Z-listers, it's bloody crime!
Patsy
|
|
|
|
Post by sootycat on Oct 4, 2005 12:23:27 GMT
I couldn't work out wether it was a ghost story or a crime drama. ( Still don't know )
Worth watching to see Robert Carlyle, first thing I've seen him on TV for ages.
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 4, 2005 16:44:09 GMT
I couldn't either or why he was having those flashbacks. Maybe all will be explained tonight.
Patsy
|
|
|
|
Post by sallywebster on Oct 4, 2005 16:56:59 GMT
Ive noticed that ITV have far to many of the same type of dramas.
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 4, 2005 17:04:08 GMT
There's a letter in the TV Times today slating their 50th anniversary back-slapping saying they should concentrate on improving programmes today instead of basking in past glories. Perhaps if they paid more attention to their past glories they'll realise what a variety of drama there was then.
Patsy
|
|
|
|
Post by gingercat on Oct 4, 2005 20:34:41 GMT
Hope its all explained in tonights episode..have it recording..did enjoy the first part.
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 4, 2005 21:39:04 GMT
Tonight's was definitely better than yesterday. Things really started picking up about halfway through so I left the crossword.
Patsy
|
|
|
|
Post by gingercat on Oct 5, 2005 19:13:05 GMT
I guessed it was her but didnt think of how it ended with her imagining her little brother.
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 5, 2005 20:47:29 GMT
Bit like Psycho the end I thought without the dressing up and knife! LOL!
Patsy
|
|
|
|
Post by sootycat on Oct 6, 2005 12:00:09 GMT
They still didn't explain why none of the chracters ( who were susequently killed ) knew who the little blonde boy was in the photo.??
|
|
|
|
Post by gingercat on Oct 6, 2005 13:43:31 GMT
Do you think it was because he was dead before they would have known him..he died at 4 years before school age & his sister added his photo on to the school photo..does that sound anygood?
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 6, 2005 21:15:58 GMT
Good point, Sooty. I hadn't even thought of that since I was so bored at times. Cracker it ain't.
Patsy
|
|
|
|
Post by sootycat on Oct 7, 2005 11:47:19 GMT
Its just that out of all the kids in that photo, the face of the little boy is very blurred an indistinct.!
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Oct 7, 2005 17:38:41 GMT
Like most of the script. LOL! It was never explained by she was 'sent' the photo either. Or even how all the pics of the dead people as kids on the different walls were exactly the same.
Patsy
|
|
