|
Post by madamesinclair on Apr 19, 2007 8:56:54 GMT
Ugh, I was right about her all along. Linda doesn't put any effort into her 'performance' and she has no chemistry with any other actor on the show.
|
|
|
Post by gudboi on Apr 19, 2007 10:38:47 GMT
I totally agree Yasmin, she has no chemistry with any actor on the show!! I thought the scenes with Carl (Tom) would test her to give a good performance, but she didn't show any signs of improvement, and now we have to endure her until christmas!!! And because she is a big name the producers would more than likely renew her contract!!
|
|
|
Post by sootycat on Apr 19, 2007 11:01:56 GMT
And she is still talking in that monotone, no emotion at all.
|
|
|
Post by madamesinclair on Apr 19, 2007 12:22:47 GMT
Audrey that is what Wolfy has said, she speaks with no emotion and really montone.
|
|
|
Post by valda on Apr 19, 2007 13:04:22 GMT
I tend to agree with both of you, she is really monotone speaking and hasn,t any emotion at all . I,ve changed my mind about Carrie I thought she would be a lot better than she is.
|
|
|
Post by madamesinclair on Apr 19, 2007 14:48:47 GMT
I just dont see where she fits in. It doesn't help that Scarlett is irritating
|
|
|
Post by SharonHarvey2 on Apr 19, 2007 15:58:54 GMT
I think I may agree regarding Carrie, though I think Scarlett is nice.
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Apr 19, 2007 19:23:28 GMT
People on Teletext agree as well.
Scarlett can stay. Lose Carrie.
Patsy
|
|
|
Post by madamesinclair on Apr 19, 2007 19:27:51 GMT
Scarlett is just too much. Over excited and overacted
|
|
|
Post by valda on Apr 19, 2007 20:40:18 GMT
Scarlett is ok she,s overexcited because she,s found her brothers , and possibly it,s her first job so will be over acting a bit even so she is a lot better than Belle
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2007 6:04:32 GMT
I agree - Linda Lusardi is far worse than I expected, tho' strangely enough, her acting is better when the character is meant to be in a good mood; she interacted pretty well with Rosemary when they had their cosy chat weeks ago.
It's when she's meant to be 'prickly' that she is particularly bad.
I like Scarlett tho' - she seems very natural to me. I agree that she seems a bit OTT at the moment but that could very well be because she's suddenly gained a whole new family. Also liked her scenes with Daz. No, I think she has potential, and can definitely stay.
|
|
|
Post by madamesinclair on Apr 20, 2007 9:19:42 GMT
I still think Scarlett is Carl's.
|
|
|
Post by valda on Apr 20, 2007 11:06:54 GMT
I,m starting to think that way too Yasmin
|
|
|
Post by Lane Kent on Apr 20, 2007 12:50:21 GMT
What little I see of Emmerdale these days, there's quite a few I don't like. And Carrie is pretty dire. I'm also waiting to see if Scarlett will turn out to be Carl's daughter changing all the dynamics, the wills etc and ultimately send them packing. I don't mind Scarlett though.
|
|
|
Post by SharonHarvey2 on Apr 20, 2007 14:49:22 GMT
At the moment I think Scarlett is lovely, I think she is acting that way, as she has suddenly found her family, she never knew she had.
I know one magazine commented on her eyes, that she has 'mad' eyes, as they are so huge! I think the actress may be 'new' to the acting world, and there is nothing about her anywhere, no interviews, and even when I emailed Emmerdale offices, they could not give me any info on Kelsey-Beth who plays her or her agents - which I found strange.
It will be interesting if she is found to be Carls' child and not Tom's.
|
|
|
Post by RitaLittlewood on Apr 20, 2007 16:25:44 GMT
I wouldn't be at all surprised, Yasmin.
Patsy
|
|
|
Post by sootycat on Apr 21, 2007 12:20:43 GMT
From the comments made by Chas and Katie last night, it seems Carl's one night stand was 2 years before Carrie had Scarlett.
|
|
|
Post by SharonHarvey2 on Apr 21, 2007 12:32:26 GMT
Yes, Katie was thinking the same as we all are and was Scarlett Carl's child, but Chas had already done the Maths, and she wasn't, so maybe she is Tom's then?
|
|
|
Post by madamesinclair on Apr 21, 2007 13:59:24 GMT
But Carl looked like he was lying when he said 16...
|
|
|
Post by SharonHarvey2 on Apr 21, 2007 16:16:33 GMT
yeah, I have to say, I am not completely convinced yet.
|
|